2014/02/26

Look at this immoral and indecent girls to unerstand who is who in Ukraine?

Yanukovich should proud on himself if he has such enemies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msFMbsw3v6U

To understand what would it happen in the US.

Here is a link for a youtube video about a violation of private life story in US.

Check it to have an idea about respect of confidentiality and privacy even for such an unimportant and basic reason.

The west constantly talks and suggests about human rights and tries to form some sovereign countries with such a pretext of alleged infringement.

Edward Snowden recently showed us the dark side of the moon. If the US ha a right to claim it is defending the human rights when constantly violates billions of people's rights by illegal surveillance.

Now please watch the video and think on it if such riots like happening in Ukraine now had happened in America what would law enforcement stuffs do?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oONF84y1cx8

People's comments indicates the common awarness of this ugly western game.

This is a news from RIA Novosti. Please focus on the comments from people in the related section at the end.

For the original document please click here

Ethnic Russian Rage Excites Secession Talk in Ukraine’s Crimea

Topic: Turbulence in Ukraine

Pro-Russian rally in Sevastopol

20:25 25/02/2014

Tags: Oleksandr Turchynov, Viktor Yanukovych, Vladimir Putin, Alexei Chaliy, Crimea, Sevastopol,Ukraine, Russia

SEVASTOPOL, February 25 (Howard Amos, RIA Novosti) – “A Russian mayor for a Russian town,” chanted the lively and irate crowd clogging the center of Sevastopol, a warm water port on the Black Sea.

Except that Sevastopol is, in actual fact, in Ukraine.

Since the opposition, much of whose ranks are occupied by unabashed Ukrainian nationalists, seized power, calls for secession have been spreading across the sprawling nation’s mainly Russian-speaking southern and eastern regions.

In Sevastopol on the Crimean peninsula, talk of greater autonomy turned to action Monday evening, when a throng numbering several thousand strong assembled outside the city hall.

Their first call was to demand that an extraordinary town council meeting recognize a local businessman with strong ties to Russia, Alexei Chaliy, as the city’s new mayor.

As some hotheads in the rabble threatened to storm the building, other waved Russian flags and brushed aside objections that Chaliy’s Russian citizenship made him ineligible for the job.

Sevastopol businessman Alexei Chaliy (r) who has a Russian citizenship was elected as the city's new mayor

Before long, the announcement filtered through that Chaliy had been voted head of a new coordination council, and within a few minutes, he appeared at a second floor window to the cries of supporters.

In a move that smoothed the process, the former mayoral incumbent Vladimir Yatsuba had earlier tearfully announced his resignation, thereby paving the way for the Russian town to get its Russian leader.

The day’s events marked the first stages in the establishment of an anti-Kiev administration amid tumultuous development that will cause headaches for the group of politicians that have replaced the administration of ousted fugitive President Viktor Yanukovych.

Similar expressions of popular anger have taken place across southern and eastern Ukraine in recent days, but nowhere is dissatisfaction with the new regime greater than in Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula of two million people, which is the country’s only region with a majority ethnic Russian population.

Chaliy’s election, which has been widely covered by Kremlin-friendly media outlets in Russia, is unprecedented. Sevastopol has not elected a mayor by popular plebiscite since Kiev deprived it of that right in 1992.

Following up on their successful collective decision to install Chaliy as city head, the gathering in Sevastopol demanded that local security forces declare their allegiance to him and set up roadblocks to seal off the city.

Speculation, often feverish, has been rife that armed units are to be dispatched from western Ukraine to subjugate Crimea and bend them to Kiev’s will.

City police chief Alexander Goncharov, who went to Monday’s meeting to answer questions, said four roadblocks manned by armed officers would be set up around the city.

“If we receive criminal orders from Kiev, we will not carry them out,” he said, in what seemed like a qualified attempt at fence-sitting as the situation becomes clearer.

One of the people in the crowd, Fyodor, 26, a sailor from Sevastopol who travels around the world on merchant ships, echoed a common hope that Moscow could get involved.

“If there’s repression of Russians in Crimea then Russia will be forced to respond,” he said.

Alexandra, who declined to give her surname, called on Russian President Vladimir Putin to take direct action.

“Putin and the Black Sea fleet should come,” she said. “We are not scared of bloodshed.”

Crimea’s ties with Russia go back a long way.

Until Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1954 transferred the territory to what was then the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Crimea was officially a part of Russia.

During Yanukovych’s tenure, which began in early 2010, Ukraine renewed Russia’s lease on the naval base in Sevastopol until 2042, cementing what was already a strong economic link between Moscow and the region.

Separatist sentiments surfaced following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and rumors have persisted ever since that the impulse is covertly encouraged by the Kremlin.

On Sunday, there was a wave of large pro-Russian rallies in Crimea. Some estimates put the turnout in Sevastopol upward of 20,000, far larger than the impromptu throng of the following day. Speakers variously condemned the new government in Kiev as fascist and openly called for secession.

“We will not submit to the regime in Kiev,” Dmitry Sinichkin, president of the local branch of motorcycle club the Night Wolves told the crowd in Sevastopol.

The Night Wolves are closely linked to Russia’s political elite. Putin has visited the group in the city several times, on one occasion in 2010 riding a three-wheeled Harley Davidson alongside the bikers.

After his speech, Sinichkin told RIA Novosti that fresh bloodshed in Ukraine’s ongoing political crisis was inevitable.

Rally-goers waved the Russian red, white and blue tricolor and yelled the football fan-style chant of “Ros-si-ya, Ros-si-ya, Ros-si-ya,” as they endorsed calls to create self-defense squads with police cooperation and withhold taxes from Kiev.

Participants of a pro-Russian rally in Sevastopol carrying "Stop Ukrainian nazism" posters

“Sevastopol is a Russian town and will always be a Russian town … we will never surrender to those fascists in Kiev,” said Anatoly, who was wearing a sweater bearing the logo of the United Russia party that dominates the political landscape in Ukraine’s eastern neighbor.

United Russia, he said, had signed a cooperation agreement with the Sevastopol Russian Community, a local society of which he was a member.

Purported moves in Moscow in recent years to push for granting Russian passports to ethnic Russians abroad has drawn fierce criticism from Kiev and sparked allegations of an attempted backdoor land grab.

While Putin had as of Tuesday refrained from making any public pronouncements on the unfolding situation, the Russian Foreign Ministry was more forthright in describing the acting government as gaining power through “dictatorial and sometimes terrorist methods.”

In remarks that hinted at possible future pressure from the Kremlin, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev expressed particular concern about Russians living in Ukraine.

Indeed, fears are rising that southern separatists will use the current crisis to provoke Russians into lending their muscle and peel Crimea away from Ukraine.

Some experts have raised the possibility of a scenario in which the peninsula becomes trapped in a frozen conflict and becomes wholly dependent on Russia, as has happened in other former Soviet nations such as Georgia, which lost control over the regions ofAbkhazia and South Ossetia, in large part because of Moscow’s involvement.

“It’s easy to imagine that the Crimea calls a referendum and gets special status within the Ukraine,” said Masha Lipman, an analyst with the Carnegie Center in Moscow. “The natural next step would be to secede … and that could turn Ukraine into an unrecognized state like Abkhazia.”
Not all in Crimea back secession, however.

The local ethnic Tartar community, a mainly Muslim population that numbers about 250,000 people, has been vocal in support of the incoming government in Kiev. That adds a potentially explosive strand to the region’s ethnic mix of Russians and Ukrainians.

How the new regime in Kiev will act is also hard to predict.

Interim President Oleksandr Turchynov warned Tuesday that he recognized that separatism was a “serious threat” and said he would liaise with security forces on how to resolve the issue.

In statements that can only have served to sow alarm, leaders from the nationalist Svoboda party, which played a central role in the opposition’s ascent to power, reportedly said Monday that Russia was dispatching extra naval forces to Crimea.

In Sevastopol, Viktor Neganov, an advisor to acting Interior Minister, told RIA Novosti that the new government was for now trying to settle the situation without the use of force.

But Neganov warned that what Chaliy is doing in the city amounts to a local coup.

“If he stays, he will go to jail as a traitor to the state,” he said.

Leave a comment

· ruypenalvaI hope Russia can do soon the job

00:58, 26/02/2014

I hope Russia can do asap the job of seize Crimea and free russians citizens from the european nazi-fascism. Crimea and Sevastopol should return to Russia.

o zoran.jelinicno

03:49, 26/02/2014

enemies wish that Crimea join Russia, than they get rest of Ukraine without any dificulties, 1% to Russia 99% to nacis, NO all Ukraine go home to Rusian world, fight can last 100 years but East will be united again, President Putin have strength and wisdom to break this threat to the survival of the Slavic people

· zoran.jelinicdefend the homeland

02:03, 26/02/2014

after 20 years of indoctrination, propaganda story about Europe and democracy, it come into people subconscious and not react to the death threat, it seems that this is happening in Russia itself,
This is a historic moment, Russia is ATTACKED, it should respond immediately with all available resources, what Ukraine what non-interference, that is Russian land, Ukrainians and Russians are one people, (the western part of Ukraine only lost it culture, the last 20 years systematically poisoned with western poison) for centuries people give lifes for that land it can’t be non-interference or lack of interest, the Nazis should once and for all time defeated and not with negotiations (didn’t with negotiations came to power) but with armed force at full strength, they should be driven out from Russian Ukraine, it is big mistake to speak with West about Ukraine, it is Russian home and West should be kicked out from there after these what they organize there, they will never speak with Russia about Scotland, why do we speak about our land with them?
with the attacker is not negotiating, Alexander Nevsky defeated them then, again there are here

o R.Deus-von HomeyerRE:Defend the homeland

18:21, 26/02/2014

@zoran.jelnic

Dera Zoran,
the ancuient Romans used to say;"UBI BENE ,IBI PATRIA!" "Where I have a good life,there is MY homeland!"

That is what the Ukrainians are thinking.They want to join the EU,because they WANT to be able to move to Germany,UK;FRance or Italy and make MORE money than they earn in UKRAINA.

The problem is,they do not comprehend WHAT PRICE they have to pay for this"freedom of movement"

They will be forced by the IMF and European Central Bank (which is in Frankfurt/Main) to take huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge loans and PLENTY of conditions will be attacehed to them.

· bielecThe agenda is strictly economic

05:29, 26/02/2014

Ukraine

is wanted by the West to deliver, with pipelines, oil and natural gas from the Persian Gulf and Baku region to Europe. Western investors and bankers will profit from it, not the Ukrainian people. Such pipelines would put out of business Russian projects, such as the South and the North Stream, and this would have serious implications on Russian economy and the standard of living of all Russians.

At present time, oil and gas from Persian Gulf cannot compete with Russian supplies. Transportation with tankers is much more expensive than transportation with pipelines and this reflects on the final prices on European markets.

In addition, Russia, as a supplier of energy resources to Europe, has some leverage on European politics which, in recent years, has become dangerously close to the aggressive and arrogant violations of international law by the U.S. and Israel.

This is why Europe is so involved in opening alternative sources of energy resources, mainly from the Persian Gulf (Qatar, Saudi Arabia). This is why former Yugoslavia was attacked and partitioned, this is why color revolutions targeted countries and regions along these planned pipelines, this is why other oil-rich countries in the Region were targeted.

Just like Syria, Ukraine is needed to run these new pipelines. Crimea is the only place where they can be blocked. Russia simply cannot afford having its cities and its infrastructure in Crimea fall into the hands of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis. This is why the current developments in Ukraine are so dangerous. We are looking at a possibility of a global military conflict that will swallow the new and self-appointed authorities of Ukraine before the conflict escalates internationally. Perhaps justice is coming faster to the Ukrainian traitors than to President Yanukovich. Tymoshenko knows why she wants to temporarily park herself in Germany. The only people who will lose are the ordinary Ukrainians who have blindly followed the foreign agents and criminal neo-Nazis.

· cheruskGo Russia ... till the Atlantic

14:58, 26/02/2014

Many West-europeans are looking forward to being liberated.

Some minor benefits among big troubles.

Accordng to my religion, Islam there may be a good thing even in a worst thing. One should not complain of the God, should not rebel, respect the God and wait with patient in difficult times. Any moment good things may come. And we humans can not know exactly what is good for us, what will be good in fact. Sometimes something looks very bad may be good in fact and we may understand this truth later. The typical most popular example to this situation is to miss the plane which will fall down.

In last years I have lived terrible things. I may say almost nothing good happened and I have been unhappy. Especially in last one month my health has got dramatically worse, I am seriously ill.

But they happened some good things even in this period. BEcause of my heart disease doctors have prohibitted me smoking and drinking. I dont smoke and drink alcohol and I have lost 10 kg. I adopted a much healthier life style. I have become a much insightful and tolerant person. I dont get angry and try to avoid hatred. I try to understand and at least to tolerate even my enemies. I keep in mind the possiblity of one may have valid reasons and may be right in a conflict with me and I may be wrong with a fact that I can not see at the moment.

So all this dangerous health problem I have suffered from have made me a more correct person.

2014/02/24

Remarkable discussion in RIA Novosti pages.

It is a significant dscussion on a news of Russian news agency RIA Novosti.

I just made copy-paste eaxctly the original text and phrases of people.

Obama Official Warns Russia on Military Action in Ukraine

Topic: Pro-EU Protests Erupt in Ukraine

WASHINGTON, February 23 (RIA Novosti) – A senior US official on Sunday warned Moscow not to send troops into Ukraine amid the political crisis gripping Russia’s ex-Soviet neighbor, saying such a move would constitute a “grave mistake.”

“It’s not in the interests of Ukrainian or of Russia or of Europe or the United States to see the country split. It’s in nobody’s interest to see violence returned and the situation escalate,” White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice said in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press."

Rice’s comments followed a report by the Financial Times last week quoting an unidentified senior Russian official as saying that Moscow could intervene to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine’s Crimea territory, home to a Russian naval base.

“If Ukraine breaks apart, it will trigger a war. They will lose Crimea first [because] we will go in and protect [it], just as we did in Georgia,” the official was quoted as saying in a reference to Russia’s 2008 war with Georgia over the breakaway republic of South Ossetia.

Rice said in Sunday’s interview that the situation in Ukraine “is not about the US and Russia” and that closer Ukrainian ties with Europe would not come at the expense of the country’s historical links with Russia.

“There is not an inherent contradiction … between a Ukraine that has longstanding historic and cultural ties to Russia and a modern Ukraine that wants to integrate more closely with Europe,” she said.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on Saturday abandoned his lavish estate in the wake of bloody street clashes between security forces and anti-government protesters last week that evaporated his authority in the capital Kiev and broad swathes of the country.

Ukrainian lawmakers impeached Yanukovych on Saturday, though he remained defiant in a statement issued the same day from a location in his political stronghold in the east of the country, describing attempts to unseat him as a coup.

Rice said that Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed with a message delivered by his American counterpart, Barack Obama, in a phone call between the two leaders Friday.

“The president’s message was, look, we have a shared interest in a Ukraine that remains unified, whole, independent and is able to exercise the will of its people freely,” she said.

In a telephone call with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Sunday, US Secretary of State John Kerry expressed the United States’ “strong support” for the Ukrainian parliament’s decision to transfer presidential duties to speaker Oleksander Turchinov, the State Department said in a statement.

Kerry also “underscored the United States’ expectation that Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and democratic freedom of choice will be respected by all states,” the State Department said.

Lavrov told Kerry, meanwhile, that the Ukrainian opposition has “effectively seized power,” refuses to lay down arms and “continues to place its stake on violence,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

Lavrov emphasized to his US counterpart that an agreement signed Friday between Yanukovych and Ukrainian opposition leaders calling for early presidential elections and constitutional reforms must be enforced, noting that the United States welcomed the deal at the time.

· zoran.jelinichard time

01:26, 24/02/2014

glove is thrown in the face of Russia , do not react decisively now , and that means only by military , it will mean disaster for Russia and all Slavs , there is a limit of humiliation that can not be exceeded , since than decline rapidly goes , all these analyzes and variants on the situation in Ukraine are counterproductive , now becomes normal to talk about coming NATO troops in Ukraine , it should not be allowed , 20 million of people were killed in the battle for the border of the Soviet Union , one inch of Ukraine should not be left, not to talk about the division , to the enemies all fits, whatever they get, get the Russian , clearly needs to be said to the west, Ukraine will not be in the EU or NATO , the Soviet space should be defended by all means , with so much a pro- Russian population in Ukraine that it is fed into the western sphere of influence , arrogance and aggression unprecedented , this disaster happened and because those who wish to destroy Russia are called partners , long time ago it was necessery to show to all enemies what are borders which can not be crossed

· bielecWhat a nerve!

02:02, 24/02/2014

Obama is the last person entitled to issue such warnings to anyone. It is the United States of America and its allies that are regularly sending what essentially is "troops" to countries like Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya or Syria. Obama did not warn Saudi Arabia not to send its troops to fight peaceful protesters in Bahrain. Obama did not warn Israel not to send troops to Gaza and West Bank, and Lebanon. Obama did not warn Turkey or Qatar to stop recruiting, supporting, arming, and training terrorists operating in Syria. Obama did not warn Europe to stop bombing a legitimate government forces in Libya. Obama's troops are believed to have assassinated former Prime Minister of Libya Muammar Gaddafi and are regularly using drones to kill political oponents in other sovereign countries. Obama has no credibility in this area and his "warnings" shall only be understood as the voice of a proven enemy of Russia.

· ruypenalvaRussia should intervene

02:12, 24/02/2014

Russia

should intervene (with troops) if needed to protect its interests in Ukraine as USA would do if such a situation were in Mexico.

· rochefortfrancois(no title)

02:20, 24/02/2014

For the interest of the humanity, it is imperative to preserve or regain statu quo between Russia aligned nations and US aligned nations. Those poeple in Ukraine are being manipulated in a way not to favor warming relashionship between Ukraine and Russia. Don't beleive in coincidences. Russia has a navy base in Ukraine and Syria. Is strange to see that those two countries are in flame.

· arsan_lupinHave any of you actually READ the entire article?

03:59, 24/02/2014

These journalists worked hard to write as factual and balanced and rational an article as possible, concerning this crisis. Before you vilify it, shouldn't you actually READ it?

“It’s not in the interests of Ukraine or Russia or Europe or the United States to see the country split. It’s in nobody’s interest to see violence returned and the situation escalate,” White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice said.
…
“Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed with a message delivered by his American counterpart, Barack Obama, in a phone call between the two leaders Friday: “We have a shared interest in a Ukraine that remains unified, whole, independent and is able to exercise the will of its people freely.”
…
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov emphasized to his US counterpart that an agreement signed Friday between Yanukovych and Ukrainian opposition leaders calling for early presidential elections and constitutional reforms must be enforced, noting that the United States welcomed the deal at the time.”

So what’s the problem?

With no outside interference other than US, EU, AND Russian politicians voicing their opinions, the Ukrainian people spoke! After some horrible bouts of violence on both sides, president Yanukovych mercifully signed an agreement with the opposition to stop the violence, thanks to the help of mediators from all sides. The Verkhovna Rada followed the law and impeached (indicted) Yanukovych. The story is far from over, but at least the fighting has stopped. We can only hope that our friends in Ukraine find a future that is best for THEM. Please, let Ukraine decide what it wants to be!

Ranting about conspiracy theories accomplishes nothing but degrade your own credibility – the world knows better. Please – give it a rest.

o bielecFor the first time,...

10:02, 24/02/2014

...I agree with you on one idea - let the Ukrainians decide about their future. However, I find it not very cridible that you really believe in what you hear from any White House official. Do you really think that they would openly admit the real goals in Ukraine, if the real goals were to replace the democratically elected president with a pro-Western puppet that will allow pipelines from Qatar and Saudi Arabia to cross Ukraine on route to Europe and will allow NATO military bases to be placed on Russian borders? They have plotted and lied since the bombing of former Yugoslavia, through 9/11, the war on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now, Ukraine. This is not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracists are those who try to deny it and sweep the truth under the carpet.

· bielecUnfortunate but true conclusion

05:24, 24/02/2014

Someone here has recently mentioned the role of Jews in inciting the unrest in Ukraine. Someone talked about Nuland, Tymoshenko, and others. Although I usually avoid generalizations and pointing my finger at any minority, many historical facts seem to support this observation.

Jews have a reputation, based on facts, of being highly organized and disciplined in all efforts aimed at gaining power and influence that are later used to exploit local populations. This explains why Jews as an ethnic group, were often persecuted and thrown out of countries that had first welcomed them and allowed them to settle. There is no smoke without a fire. Many other minorities live together and contribute to the general good of their host countries. Not Jews, who sooner or later try to corrupt the system, infiltrate the elites, gain power, and squeeze local residents like lemons. The lates stage can be observed in Western countries as we speak. Local economies are destroyed, populations are being pauperized, looting, corruption and speculation are everywhere, monopolization and price gouging replaced government control and regulations. Jews run many local political parties' associations and monopolized the fund raising for election campaigns. Jews select and appoint the candidates on which people later "vote".

Jews are known to work diligently for any power in exchange for privileges. They have infiltrated the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and gained complete control at higher levels of KGB and other similar services in Soviet satellite countries. They have served in SB - the Polish secret police that tortured and killed many Polish patriots after WW2. They have prepared, since 1976, the "Solidarity" movement in Poland by running the KOR organization that defended workers persecuted for political reasons. They have quickly taken over the "Solidarity", then claimed to represent the nation in the so called Round Table Talks, followed by free elections in which former communists received immunity and privilages and Jews took over major political positions and major media outlets in the country. They have led the way to the sellout of Polish national resources and industries that were later bancruped to make way for Western products, Western investors and Western banks. They are still controlling political power in Poland.

Jews plotted, intrigued, and used their organized networks to run most of the so called colour revolutions and most of the NGOs in the post-Soviet sphere, promoting Soros's "Civil Society" - a fifth column designed to circumvent democracy and remove democratically elected governments that did not want to serve the Western masters. And Jews are behind the Neo-Nazi organizations destabilizing Ukraine today.

Just like in the other cases throughout history, there is no doubt that also in Ukraine, these alleged "humanitarian" efforts are exclusively political in nature. After so many examples, people should not be blind or blindly following these highly skilled manipulators. And definitely, Ukrainians should not elect them to any positions of power. Ukraine should be for the Ukrainians - this was the position of President Yanukovich, for which he may now be persecuted by the same Jews who spilled Ukrainian blood around the EuroMaidan for their own gain.

- FabriciusFederalisation of Ukraine
  
  18:10, 24/02/2014
  Federalisation of Ukraine seems to be the only solution before a slauter and another genocide of all the russian speaking of Ukraine. It will give a leverage to the extrem right or puppet opposition in kiev and force them to listen or risk to loose the other part of the country (est and south + crimea)! just do like switzerland, one country, 2 languages (french/german)... and it works pretty well! do it quick before it turn really nasty....
  
  Reply
Mikhail1228Putin not losing sleep!

17:00, 24/02/2014
I don't think Putin will lose any sleep over comments made by Rice, Obama or McCain. It would take Russia less than 6 hours to invade eastern Ukraine and neutralize any threat to its Sevastopol base and ethnic Russians in Ukraine.

Russia and China are the founding member states of The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) an intergovernmental military alliance of mutual security.

Shanghai Cooperation Organization Forces:

Active personnel 5,325,000
Reserve personnel 7,675,000
Available personnel for immediate activation and Conscription 192,039,958

Total of personnel 205,039,958

The economic and numerical might of China, together with the military prowess and nuclear arsenal of Russia.

Again, I don't think Putin is losing any sleep!!!

Reply
Mikhail1228Karma is a bitch!

17:14, 24/02/2014
People and lives devastated by EU austerity measures have been glued to the news about what has happened in Ukraine. The new American concept of democracy is that when an elected government makes a major decision many dislike, the people should take to the streets, shut down and set the capital ablaze until the authorities reverse course or resign! The spillover from this will backfire on the EU. Karma is a bitch!

Reply
BlizzardWhat a thugs are USA

17:29, 24/02/2014
As EU citizen I feel ashamed, embarrassed and angry of what is going on in and around the Ukraine. I personally do not see any problem in removing a despots such as Yanukovych: Actually I welcome them when they are made in civilised way and without any external influence never mind meddling.

It was clear to all of us in EU that Ukraine was due to become hotspot on the world's political map as that was a country that too many strive to use just for the one single purpose – to weaken and degrade Russian influence in the region and in the world.

Despite more than two decades since cold war officially ended, Russia is still considered as arch enemy of the West. NATO never accepted Russia as non-threatening and piece loving neighbour and therefore in their unchanged doctrine still stands that Russia is arch enemy of the free world and should be destroyed as such. The problem was that Russia does not pose any threat to NATO and that fact was driving many member states to soften such hard approach. Reason for that is that NATO had purpose and goals during Cold War, but since Cold War officially ended, there is no more viable reason for maintaining such belligerent organization, only to US insistence and pressure it stayed further. However as far as US is concern Russia should be reduced to rouble of small independent countries hating each other and who would be in permanent, economically ever depleting, war. As such they would become easy pray for ever stalking and bullying American Government and corporations.

During Yeltsin's infamous period of ruling US gained access to all Russian strategic resources and all for a bottle or two of cheap spirits. That schizophrenic and drunkard of Yeltsin destroyed whatever was worth in Russia and offered for sale to USA. Only Putin's arrival stopped that madness and he successfully kicked out USA by taking back all that they stole. That was a top humiliation for USA and they will never forget it or forgive.

Now Ukraine become new battlefield which was simply said “dream come trough” for US. They are just now ending very unsatisfactory campaign in Afghanistan and Irak and are “gloriously” pooling out leaving all in rubble and hundreds of thousands of dead civilians behind them. As one US senator short time ago said: “Let us declare victory in Afghanistan and let's get the hell out of there”.

That sentence describes American attitude more than anything else. US are selfish and intellectually as well as socially underdeveloped bully, who thinks that it can do all what it wants and that all it does is the right thing, no matter if international community agrees or not. Americans reserve their right to intervene wherever and whenever they declare that either their national interest is at stake or national security threatened no matter how small and unimportant enemy might be (Grenada, Panama, Nicaragua and so on, the list is too long), they will use all their might to lessen culprit. As every bully they are unintelligent and believe that the force is ultimate resolve of all problems.

As the Ukraine is former USSR Republic it is obvious that it is in Russian sphere of dominance and influence and that Russia will never go easy over that if Ukraine becomes member of NATO. Now they needed new scenario how to extract Ukraine from the Russian influence by presenting it as a people's will. Ukraine was already in huge internal turmoil as the local thugs, criminals, oligarchs and corrupt politicians were robbing own nation and depleting already poor economy.

It is my belief that US agencies were already operating in Ukraine searching for dissatisfied and rebellious people who might take on the streets when that moment come. There are to many indications that West did all they can to oust Yanukovych and replace it with some marionette such as Klitscko who is all over Angela Merkel. I am German, and I follow our newspapers, magazines and our TV where such small print details pop out from time to time. Our most prominent Der Spiegel is often very direct and truthful, which is not a case with most of other newspapers, and there they also assume that US might be deeply involved in Ukrainian affair.

It is extremely cynical and hypocritical when US speak about their view of the situation and when they warn other against something that is their way of life. US has no moral hight to advise other what to do. I found it extremely stupid to say the least, when US diplomats expressed hope that Russia will not stop their financial help to Ukraine and will pay next 2 billion USD now when the new pro Western government is in place. It is very clear in politics that when someone is pro one side than is automatically against the other. There is no other option especially if the interests of both sides are opposite to each other.

It seams to me that everyone in Western world of politics is living in accordance to image of Russians created by Hollywood where every Russian is portrayed as complete imbecile and stupid as a rock. All of them treat Russia as such by expecting that Russia will just forget 20 billion USD of Ukrainian debts and on top of that infuse additional 15 billion and sit quiet and watch how new pro-Western government spits over them. I think that all of them will be soon in for a shock when they realise that Ukraine will have to repay overdue 20 billion USD in one go and that there will be no money coming from Russia.

Dear readers, ask yourself how much would be inclined our Iron Lady to financially support Ukraine if she recently buried Cyprus for much less money. Please pay close attention to the fact that our economic institute calculated that Ukraine would need direct investments way in excess of 4000 (Four thousand) EUR in the period of 15 years in order to bring Ukraine to the EU average. Please can anyone with a modest decency tell that this is going to happen? No Ukraine is used as a tool to undermine Russian influence and image.

US would do anything they can to harm Russian national interest as well as economic. Now they are first to speak loud that Ukraine cannot be divided even though recently they instigated separation and declaration of independent Kosovo region. It seams to me that eastern part of Ukraine is better off than western agricultural side and therefore they are concerned that only poverty will come onto their burden. If the principles of self-determination are applicable in other cases they should be applicable in all other cases. There are no cases more just than the other. Rights are equal and applicable to the all.

If West of Ukraine wants pro Western government and the East not than there is no other solution than to draw the new border line, regardless what USA and EU want. They should get the piece of cake which is designated for them and nothing more.

If Russia decides to intervene militarily in order to protect civilians who are asking for their protection than it is their moral and legal obligation to do so. There is simply no case for US to meddle with Ukraine and to orchestrate events as it would suit them. They are common thugs and as such do not to be considered as any reasonable voice. They are all the time trying to secure their own interests regardless of the other nations opinion.

Just for the end PLEASE WATCH AND LISTEN TO THIS SPEACH it is worth every minute you will spend.

http://www.ted.com/talks/mikko_hypponen_how_the_nsa_betrayed_the_world_s_trust_time_to_act.html

Reply
- Mikhail1228Very good post!
  
  19:33, 24/02/2014
  Thank you a very good post!
  
  Reply
- R.Deus-von HomeyerRE:MUCH TO DO ABOUT NOTHING!
  
  19:40, 24/02/2014
  iF Obama,merkel and other Western politicians are meddling in Ukraine,it does NOT matter at all!
  
  Sooner or later Ukraina will comprehend,that it is because of GEOPÒLITICAL reasons,their BEST partner is and will be Russia.
  
  Reply

You may visit the page to join the discussion here

Translate

TAGS